MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Loss of Imprinting of DLK1 Due to Promoter Hypermethylation Accounts Frequently for Its Overexpression in AML.

2007· article· en· W2580033002 on OpenAlexaff
Haytham Khoury, Samantha Wu, Fernando Suárez, Charlotte Harken Jensen, Børge Teisner, Mark D. Minden

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenomic imprintingBiologyMethylationCpG siteMolecular biologyNonsense-mediated decayDNA methylationPromoterGeneCancer researchGeneticsGene expressionRNA splicingRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract DLK1 is an imprinted gene paternally expressed that encodes a transmembrane protein of the EGF superfamily. It contains an extracellular domain, a cleavage site, a transmembrane domain and a short cytoplasmic tail. The ectodomain of DLK1 may be cleaved and released into the extracellular matrix as a soluble molecule referred to as fetal antigen-1 (FA1). Due to structural similarity with the IGF2-H19 imprinted region, it has been hypothesized that DLK1-Meg3 is regulated in a similar manner. In this case loss of imprinting (LOI) of DLK1 would be caused by hypermethlation of the 3′-intergenic differentially methylated region (IG-DMR) of the maternal allele. As this is also the upstream regulatory region of Meg3, expression of maternal Meg3 would be reduced. Recently, it was reported that DLK1 is overexpressed in myeloid malignancies. To better characterize this overexpression in AML and identify its mechanism, we studied DLK1 expression by real time RT-PCR in 92 patients (pts), quanitified serum FA1 by ELISA, analyzed whether loss of imprinting (LOI) could account for its upregulation by studying the expression of 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs#1802710, rs#2295660, rs#1058009) and their allelic expression in 16 AML pts and finally quantified by mass spectrometry the methylation pattern of 7 CpG islands located within the imprinted region on 14q32 in 3 healthy individuals and 8 AML pts. The CpG islands analyzed were located at Meg3 promoter (3 islands), the IG-DMR (1 island), DLK1 promoter (1 island) and DLK1 exons (2 islands). DLK1 overexpression was noticed in 80% of AML. Pts with trilineage dysplasia (TLD) and APL showed consistently higher DLK1 transcript. FA1 was increased in 20% of AML all of which were found to be either AML with TLD or APL. All cases with high FA1 expressed the DLK1 isoform that contains the extracellular domain and the cleavage site, whereas the cases with normal FA1 levels expressed shorter isoforms that lack the cleavage site. Informative SNPs were found in 11 cases. In 10, the SNP was at the location of rs#1802710 and in one at rs#1058009. Analysis for DLK1 transcripts revealed biallelic expression in 8 pts (72%). Cases with biallelic expression showed higher DLK1 transcripts than monoallelic ones (p=0.001). Interestingly, the quantitative methylation analysis revealed that pts with biallelic expression did not constantly have hypermethylation of the IG-DMR or Meg3 promoter but a distinctive methylation pattern of the DLK1 promoter. While monoallelic pts showed a pattern similar to healthy individuals with overall methylation around 49%, bialllelic patients had hypermethlytion of the DLK1 promoter with overall methylation of (87%). The IG-DMR was hemimethylated in all cases. Hypermethylation of Meg3 promoter was seen in 2 pts with positive correlation with Meg3 transcript level. Our results indicate DLK1 is overexpressed in a large proportion of AML. FA1 is particularly elevated in AML with TLD and APL. Whether FA1 level could be clinically useful in such cases is still to be determined. Moreover DLK1 overexpression in AML is frequently due to LOI. Finally, The DLK1-Meg3 imprinted region has a distinctive mode of regulation in which each gene is regulated through the hypermethylation of its respective promoter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207