Use of superconducting fault current limiters for mitigation of distributed generation influences in radial distribution network fuse–recloser protection systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, extensive dynamic simulation studies are carried out to explore the impact of synchronous machine (SM)‐based distributed generation (DG) integration on existing radial fuse–recloser protection infrastructure. Furthermore, dynamic simulation studies are also conducted to highlight the use of superconducting fault current limiters (SFCLs) to mitigate such an impact. These studies have included the effects of SM‐based DG sources on fuse–recloser coordination and recloser sensitivity adequacy. In addition, a comparison between the performances of two different SFCL types has been also offered. The dynamic results of these investigations have shown that the presence of SFCLs has prevented any excessive fault current contribution from SM‐based DG sources, as a result, it has restored the fuse–recloser coordination and recloser sensitivity adequacy. Within the frame of reference of the study is the dynamic simulations of a test benchmark that have been conducted using the PSCAD/EMTDC software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".