Bibliographic record
Abstract
Right on the heels of the Ebola crisis, the global community now faces its fourth Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), widely covered as the ‘Zika crisis’. Although the declaration of a PHEIC pertains specifically to “the recent cluster of microcephaly cases and other neurological disorders”, the WHO’s first Strategic Response Framework (1) was almost exclusively preoccupied with the Zika virus and its vector, the aedes egypti mosquito. The Framework’s objectives focused on surveillance, vector control, promotion of protective behaviours, and fast-tracking research and development of diagnostic tests and vaccines. However, the WHO revised its Strategic Response since then, drawing greater attention to the support that families and children with Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) will need in the short- and long- term in order to reach their full potential. Using the ‘F-words of childhood disability’ (2) — function, fitness, family, friends, fun, and future — as a guide, this article identifies and discusses important responses to the PHEIC that have received little to no attention by any of the organizations self-reporting to the WHO’s ‘4Ws Emergency Portal’ as of 18 June 2016.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".