Initial clinical experience with the GORE<sup>®</sup> CARDIOFORM ASD occluder for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: CARDIOFORM ASD Occluder (GCO). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure has become the treatment of choice for secundum ASD. A wide range of occluder devices are available, but concern has been raised about the risk of cardiac erosion associated with rigid devices and future access to the left atrium METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients treated with the GCO at three Canadian centers. Primary outcomes were procedural success and residual shunting at follow-up, as well as 30-day major adverse events. Secondary outcomes included new onset atrial arrhythmias, wire frame fractures (WFF), and all cause mortality. Clinical, echocardiographic, procedural data, and follow-up outcome variables were collected in each participating hospital. RESULTS: Between February and December 2015, 26 patients (5 children and 21 adults) underwent transcatheter ASD closure with the GCO and were included in the study cohort. Procedural success was achieved in 22 of 26 patients (85%) and no major procedural complications were observed. Two patients (8%) presented new onset atrial tachyarrhythmia during early follow-up (0-30 days). Follow-up echocardiography (median of 119 days [IQR: 92-146]) demonstrated no residual shunt in all implanted patients. After a median clinical follow-up of 174 days (IQR: 135-239), one patient died of an unrelated cause, there were no documented major adverse cardiovascular events. Fluoroscopic imaging of the device was performed in 20 patients (91%), and WFF was noted in five cases. No clinical consequence or device dysfunction was observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-man multicenter study, the GCO was safe and effective for ASD closure, with no major adverse events or residual shunt at follow-up. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".