MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580944945 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.102.102

Outcome of Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Comparison of Cyclophosphamide and Total Body Irradiation Versus VP16 and Total Body Irradiation Conditioning Regimens.

2004· article· en· W2580944945 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adam Gassas, Lillian Sung, Fred Saunders, John Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotal body irradiationMedicineTransplantationCyclophosphamideSurgeryInternal medicineGastroenterologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Stem cell transplantation (SCT) has become the standard therapy for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or certain high-risk features at diagnosis. The authors report their experience with SCT for 108 children with ALL conditioned with 2 different regimens over 14 years period. Children (0–18y) who received fully matched-related (MRD) or fully matched-unrelated (MUD) for a diagnosis of ALL in the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto between 1990–1998 were conditioned with a single dose of VP16 (60mg/kg infused over 4 hours) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI; 1200cGy) in six fractions over 3 days (VP/TBI). Between 1998–2003, children with ALL were conditioned with cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg infused over 1 hour daily for 4 days followed by fractionated total body irradiation (TBI; 1200cGy) in six fractions over 3 days (CY/TBI). All children received cyclosporine A and a short course of methotrexate for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Results: Sixty-two children with ALL were conditioned with VP16/TBI, 36 MRD transplantation and 26 MUD transplantation. Median age at SCT was 9.4y (range 0.8–19.4). Remissions status at SCT were; complete remission (CR) 1 (n=17), CR 2 (n=32), and CR 3 (n=12) and one patient received SCT in relapse. Forty-six patients were conditioned with CY/TBI, 23 MRD transplantation and 23 MUD transplantation. Median age at SCT was 9.2y (range 1–17.5) Remissions status at SCT time were; CR 1 (n=11), CR 2 (n=29), and CR 3 (n=6). Neutrophils engraftment (defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of > 0.5 x 109/l for 2 consecutive days) occurred at 19d (range 10–28d) and 17d (range 10–28d) for the VP16/TBI and the CY/TBI groups, respectively. Two patients failed to engraft in the VP16/TBI group, one required re- conditioning with cyclophosphamide and ATG and a second dose of stem cells from the same donor, the other patient sustained a fatal intracranial hemorrhage. There was no significant difference in three years event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between the groups with EFS and OS of 47 ± 7%, 55 ± 7% for the VP16/TBI and 51 ± 8%, 53 ± 8% for the CY/TBI group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), transplant related mortality (TRM) between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Both VP16/TBI and CY/TB regimen are equally effective preparative regimens for SCT in pediatric ALL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207