Leukemic Stem Cells of Chronic Phase CML Patients Possess Uniquely Elevated BCR-ABL Kinase Activity and Acquire Spontaneous BCR-ABL Kinase Domain Mutations at a High Frequency.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Growing evidence indicates that the therapeutic potential of imatinib mesylate (IM) for the treatment of CML may be limited initially by a relative innate resistance of the leukemic stem cells and eventually by an accumulation of cells with BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain mutations. We now show that the amount and tyrosine kinase activity of p210-BCR-ABL in the most primitive and relatively IM-unresponsive lin−CD34+CD38− CML cells is 3 to 10-fold higher than in the majority of the lin−CD34+CD38+ CML progenitors (n=3). These results confirm previous BCR-ABL transcript data and identify elevated p210-BCR-ABL expression to be a likely important factor in the characteristic IM-insensitivity of very primitive CML cells. To determine whether in vivo, CML stem cells also accumulate gene mutations affecting the BCR-ABL kinase domain, cDNAs were prepared from RNA extracts of purified lin−CD34+CD38− cells isolated from 3 chronic phase patients that had not received IM therapy. Bidirectional sequencing of individually cloned cDNAs from these samples revealed BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in 2 of the 3 patients at frequencies of 10% (1/10), 20% (2*/10,*identical mutations). Incubation of these lin−CD34+CD38− cells in vitro for 2–3 wk ± a high concentration of IM (up to 10 μM, which was sufficient to reduce the tyrosine kinase activity in the input cells by 70±12% and in their 2 wk progeny by 10±5%) selected a subpopulation of more differentiated and completely IM-resistant cells. This was shown in Western blots by the inability of 10 μM IM to reduce either their p210-BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity or CrkL phosphorylation and in methylcellulose assays ±5 μM IM. As predicted, IM-selected cells showed a higher frequency of kinase domain mutations (13–20% vs 0–20% of cDNA clones analyzed from 3 wk cells cultured ±IM). Analysis of individual colonies produced from CFCs in the cultured cells showed all (21/21) colonies from IM-selected cells had mutations vs 50% (5/10) in those cultured without IM. The total frequency of mutant cDNAs detected was also increased in the IM-resistant cells (35–55% vs 10–25% mutant cDNAs in selected vs control cells). Interestingly, in most cases, both wild-type and mutant cDNAs were identified in the same colony, indicating de novo generation of mutations in vitro. Overall, >50 different mutations were identified. These included 10 point mutations previously associated with clinical IM resistance (including G250 and T315), another 13 point mutations previously identified in a comprehensive mutational screen, and >20 previously undescribed mutations. Several of the latter affect the critical region of the P loop, the c-helix and the activation loop and would be predicted to confer significant IM resistance. To investigate the possibility that the observed genomic instability of very primitive CML cells might be related to their elevated innate p210-BCR-ABL activity, BCR-ABL transcript levels in individual IM-selected, fully resistant and control (similarly treated but no IM exposure) colonies were compared. This showed that BCR-ABL transcripts were ~20-fold higher (P<0.05) in the resistant colonies (30 assessed from 3 patients). These findings suggest that the increased BCR-ABL expression and activity that uniquely characterizes the most primitive CML cells may contribute not only to their innate insensitivity to IM but also to a deregulation of genomic stability leading to the emergence of IM-resistant mutants and other subclones associated with disease progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".