Comparative Cellular Studies of the VWF Exon 4–5 Deletion Mutation Using Patient-Derived Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOEC) and Megakaryocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 1076 The von Willebrand factor (VWF) exon 4–5 deletion mutation has been described in up to 33% of type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. The deletion of exons 4 and 5 abolish the first N-linked glycosylation site, which would most likely disrupt trafficking of the protein to the proper chaperones. Since VWF is synthesized in endothelial cells and megakaryocytes, these cells are the most representative of the pathophysiology of VWF mutations. The objective of the current study was to investigate the molecular basis of the exon 4–5 deletion mutation using two comparative cellular systems: blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC) and megakaryocytes (MK). A family in the Canadian type 3 VWD population was identified as having the exon 4–5 deletion mutation. The index case (IC), T001, has type 3 VWD (VWF:Ag=0.01 IU/ml, VWF:RCo=0.02 IU/ml, FVIII:C=0.02 IU/ml, bleeding score=23) and is homozygous for the deletion and the mother, T156, has type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag=0.14 IU/ml, VWF:RCo= 0.13 IU/ml, FVIII:C=0.45 IU/ml, bleeding score=12) and is heterozygous. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from both patients in order to isolate and culture BOEC. Endothelial cell phenotype was confirmed by flow cytometry. VWF expression in patient BOEC showed a decrease in secretion by 87% in T156 and by 98% in T001 compared to control BOEC, similar decreases to those seen in previously published in vitro studies of this mutation. Confocal immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy showed both qualitative and quantitative defects in Weibel-Palade body (WPB) formation in T156 and a complete absence of WPBs in T001, with only diffuse staining of VWF present. Decreased stimulated release of VWF using PMA from T156's BOEC (26% increase) compared to control BOEC (40% increase) was observed. In T156, this degree of release is similar to the response clinically upon DDAVP administration (1 hour post VWF:Ag=0.30 IU/ml, FVIII:C=1.0 IU/ml; 2 hours post VWF:Ag =0.16 IU/ml, FVIII:C=0.76 IU/ml). Patient MKs were also isolated from peripheral blood samples and cultured by stimulating immunomagnetic isolated CD34+ cells. In T156 the VWF IF staining pattern was both diffuse and punctate and there was some co-localization with P-selectin. Despite the complete absence of VWF in platelets from T001 per immunoblot, VWF was observed in the MKs using IF microscopy. The observations that the patient's VWF IF staining pattern was diffuse rather than punctate combined with absent colocalization with the alpha granule membrane protein P-selectin within MKs, suggest that MK-synthesized VWF is not packaged into alpha granules. In conclusion we have further evaluated the molecular pathogenesis of a common and recurrent VWD mutation using two comparative cellular approaches, which demonstrates the importance of such cell types in further understanding the pathophysiology of VWD. Disclosures: Walker: Baxter Corporation: Research Funding. James:CSL-Behring, Baxter, Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".