MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comparative Cellular Studies of the VWF Exon 4–5 Deletion Mutation Using Patient-Derived Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOEC) and Megakaryocytes

2012· article· en· W2581395724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mackenzie Bowman, Ling Li, Fred G. Pluthero, Hilary Christensen, Irwin Walker, Walter H.A. Kahr, Paula James

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand factorExonVon Willebrand diseasePopulationMutationPlateletMolecular biologyImmunologyAndrologyChemistryInternal medicineMedicineBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1076 The von Willebrand factor (VWF) exon 4–5 deletion mutation has been described in up to 33% of type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. The deletion of exons 4 and 5 abolish the first N-linked glycosylation site, which would most likely disrupt trafficking of the protein to the proper chaperones. Since VWF is synthesized in endothelial cells and megakaryocytes, these cells are the most representative of the pathophysiology of VWF mutations. The objective of the current study was to investigate the molecular basis of the exon 4–5 deletion mutation using two comparative cellular systems: blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC) and megakaryocytes (MK). A family in the Canadian type 3 VWD population was identified as having the exon 4–5 deletion mutation. The index case (IC), T001, has type 3 VWD (VWF:Ag=0.01 IU/ml, VWF:RCo=0.02 IU/ml, FVIII:C=0.02 IU/ml, bleeding score=23) and is homozygous for the deletion and the mother, T156, has type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag=0.14 IU/ml, VWF:RCo= 0.13 IU/ml, FVIII:C=0.45 IU/ml, bleeding score=12) and is heterozygous. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from both patients in order to isolate and culture BOEC. Endothelial cell phenotype was confirmed by flow cytometry. VWF expression in patient BOEC showed a decrease in secretion by 87% in T156 and by 98% in T001 compared to control BOEC, similar decreases to those seen in previously published in vitro studies of this mutation. Confocal immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy showed both qualitative and quantitative defects in Weibel-Palade body (WPB) formation in T156 and a complete absence of WPBs in T001, with only diffuse staining of VWF present. Decreased stimulated release of VWF using PMA from T156's BOEC (26% increase) compared to control BOEC (40% increase) was observed. In T156, this degree of release is similar to the response clinically upon DDAVP administration (1 hour post VWF:Ag=0.30 IU/ml, FVIII:C=1.0 IU/ml; 2 hours post VWF:Ag =0.16 IU/ml, FVIII:C=0.76 IU/ml). Patient MKs were also isolated from peripheral blood samples and cultured by stimulating immunomagnetic isolated CD34+ cells. In T156 the VWF IF staining pattern was both diffuse and punctate and there was some co-localization with P-selectin. Despite the complete absence of VWF in platelets from T001 per immunoblot, VWF was observed in the MKs using IF microscopy. The observations that the patient's VWF IF staining pattern was diffuse rather than punctate combined with absent colocalization with the alpha granule membrane protein P-selectin within MKs, suggest that MK-synthesized VWF is not packaged into alpha granules. In conclusion we have further evaluated the molecular pathogenesis of a common and recurrent VWD mutation using two comparative cellular approaches, which demonstrates the importance of such cell types in further understanding the pathophysiology of VWD. Disclosures: Walker: Baxter Corporation: Research Funding. James:CSL-Behring, Baxter, Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→