MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581630399 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00447

Corrigendum: Exome Sequencing Reveals Primary Immunodeficiencies in Children with Community-Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sepsis

2016· erratum· en· W2581630399 on OpenAlexaff
Samira Asgari, Paul J. McLaren, Jane Peake, Melanie Wong, Richard Wong, István Bartha, Joshua Francis, Katia Abarca, Kyra A. Gelderman, Philipp Agyeman, Christoph Aebi, Christoph Berger, Jacques Fellay, Luregn J. Schlapbach

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune responses and vaccinations
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExome sequencingPseudomonas aeruginosaSepsisMedicinePrimary immunodeficiencyBiologyMicrobiologyImmunologyGeneticsBacteriaGenePhenotypeImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E.g. 1: There was a mistake in the gene name reference to MKL1 on page 6, right column, last sentence of 2nd paragraph. The sentences says: “This was recently illustrated by Record et al., who used exome sequencing in a girl with P. aeruginosa sepsis and found a homozygous LoF mutation in MAP3K9 (MKL1), a gene that was not known to cause PID (22).” The correct form of the sentence should be “This was recently illustrated by Record et al., who used exome sequencing in a girl with P. aeruginosa sepsis and found a homozygous LoF mutation in MKL1, a gene that was not known to cause PID (22)." “The authors apologize for the mistake. This error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicImmune responses and vaccinationsFrench-language works237,207