MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581771388 · doi:10.17140/vmoj-2-113

The Social Behaviour of Neutered Male Dogs Compared to Intact Dogs (Canis Lupus Familiaris): Video Analyses, Questionnaires and Case Studies

2017· article· en· W2581771388 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carina A. Kaufmann, Sarah Forndran, Chantal Stauber, Kathrin Woerner, Udo Gansloßer

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Medicine - Open Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanisSystemic lupus erythematosusLabrador RetrieverPsychologyBiologyVeterinary medicineMedicinePathologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Gonadectomy is a regularly performed procedure in domestic dogs. Apart from preventing reproduction, neutering is also conducted for reasons of health and to change or remove undesirable behaviour. From the ethological perspective, castration may have a negative impact on the social behaviour of male dogs. Objectives: The question to be answered is whether there are differences in certain behaviours between neutered and intact male dogs and to gain further insight into the effects of neutering on a male dog's behaviour by comparing the social behaviour of neutered and intact animals in an observational part as well as by evaluating questionnaires submitted by dog owners. Methods: Using video recordings from Germany and Switzerland of six groups of dogs, consisting of 18 intact and 16 neutered males in total, the social behaviour of the dogs was analyzed. Specific behaviours were compared between the castrated and intact males and statistically analyzed. Furthermore, 29 questionnaires based on the studies conducted by Turcsn et al on 104 dogs and their dog owners have been incorporated into this study. Additionally, 54 case studies from our consultancy were evaluated. Results: Significant differences were found in patterns of behaviour such as smelling and licking the genital area, chin rest, tooth chatter and molesting other dogs (Mann-Whitney-U-Test, U=382.000, p=0.001, when analysed in frequencies; Randomization test for 'molesting', F=13.044; p=0.001, when analysed for its duration ). Also, the non-castrated males show more behaviour indicating high status. The results of the questionnaires indicate a trend that neutered males react emotionally more unstable in stressful situations and the case studies show a tendency for aggressive behaviour and fear to be more frequent in castrated dogs. Conclusion: Our results support the assumption that castration may have a negative influence on the behaviour of male dogs. Neutered dogs may gain attractiveness for intact dogs which can lead to a high stress factor for the castrates. Accordingly, dog owners should be aware of the consequences for the dog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Medicine - Open JournalSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207