MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581779033 · doi:10.20361/g2vp6k

I Am Not a Number by J.K. Dupuis & K. Kacer

2017· article· en· W2581779033 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Leslie Aitken

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Deakin Review of Children s Literature · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)HistoryGenealogyArtArt historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dupuis, Jenny Kay and Kathy Kacer. I Am Not a Number, illustrated by Gillian Newland. Second Story Press, 2016. An Indian Agent’s visit to their home on Nipissing Reserve No. 10 begins this harrowing tale of eight-year-old Irene Couchie and two of her young brothers. Their parents, threatened with the force of the law as it then exists, watch helplessly as the children board a bus and are driven away to a residential school. Once there, the youngsters suffer a year of deprivation and abuse, both physical and emotional. By the time they return home at the end of the school year, they are traumatized. Ultimately, Irene reveals what they have endured to their parents, and their father takes a determined stance to protect them. Dupuis’ story details a segment of her family’s history based on the experience of her grandmother, Irene Couchie Dupuis, student number 759 at the “Spanish Indian Residential School” in 1928. It also details a segment of Canadian history that has now become all too familiar, all too shameful, and all too heartbreaking. The author’s end notes provide a brief outline of the residential school system in Canada, along with photographs of Irene Couchie, her mother and siblings, and her father, Chief Ernest Couchie.Gillian Newland’s illustrations are a highly realistic, very evocative accompaniment to Dupuis’ text. They set the tone and establish the mood of the story. The reading level of the text would make it accessible to children in upper elementary school. The subject matter, however, suggests its appropriateness for older students, as well, for it raises such issues as child rights, parental rights, Canadian constitutional rights, and Indigenous rights. I Am Not a Number would be an excellent starting point for anyone pursuing these issues.Highly Recommended: 4 stars out of 4Reviewer: Leslie AitkenLeslie Aitken’s long career in librarianship involved selection of children’s literature for school, public, special, and university collections. She is a former Curriculum Librarian at the University of Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2620.125

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Deakin Review of Children s LiteratureSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207