MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582151635 · doi:10.1002/eco.1840

Do the hydrological responses to forest disturbances in large watersheds vary along climatic gradients in the interior of British Columbia, Canada?

2017· article· en· W2582151635 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mingfang Zhang, Xiaohua Wei, Qiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueEcohydrology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)WatershedClimate changePrecipitationWillowEvapotranspirationWater balanceForest managementEcologyGeologyGeographyAgroforestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrological responses to forest disturbances are highly variable among watersheds. Climatic factors including water and energy are major drivers that determine the hydrological responses to forest disturbances. Although there are a number of large watershed studies on identifying the role of climate in the hydrological response to forest disturbances (e.g., logging, insect infestation, and fire), they are mainly concentrated on the precipitation effect. Given that climatic factors including both water and energy interact dynamically with hydrology and forest, and accordingly with forest–water relationships, there is a need for understanding the joint controls of water and energy on hydrological responses to forest changes by use of an integrated climatic index. In this study, 6 large watersheds along climatic gradients (Willow, Cottonwood, Baker, Moffat, Tulameen, and Ashnola) in the interior of British Columbia (BC), Canada, were selected for investigating the effect of climate on hydrological responses to forest disturbances at a large watershed scale by using modified double mass curves and statistical analysis (time series cross‐correlation, linear regression, and Mann–Whitney U test). Key results include the following: (a) in watersheds with a cumulative equivalent clear‐cut area of over 30% (Willow, Baker, Moffat, and Tulameen), mean annual flows were significantly increased by about 21–60 mm due to cumulated forest disturbances and (b) mean annual flow response to forest disturbances varied along climatic gradient. The amount of mean annual flow increase due to forest disturbances in energy‐limited watersheds Willow and Tulameen was as 3 times as that in water‐limited watersheds Baker and Moffat. Similarly, mean annual flow changes due to forest disturbances in wetter years were greater than those in drier years as suggested by results from the study watersheds. These findings highlight the need to develop different strategies for forests management in water‐limited and energy‐limited watersheds to minimize or adapt hydrological changes due to forest disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcohydrologySame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207