MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Elemental Arsenic Levels in Plasma, Cellular and Tissue Compartments After Oral Arsenic Trioxide Maintenance Treatment: Implications On Long-Term Safety.

2009· article· en· W2582234884 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wing Y. Au, Sidney Tam, Bonnie Mei-Wah Fong, Yok‐Lam Kwong

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenic trioxideMedicineBone marrowArsenicAcute promyelocytic leukemiaGastroenterologyInternal medicineSurgeryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2064 Poster Board II-41 Background. Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) is a standard medication in the management algorithm of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). With the advent of oral As2O3, outpatient treatment, convenient dosing and long-term post-remission maintenance therapy have become possible. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety profile of short-term oral As2O3 therapy are well-defined. With prolonged oral-As2O3 therapy, possible accumulation of elemental arsenic and its possible long-term side effects must be determined. Materials and methods. Paired peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) (aspirate and trephine biopsy) specimens were prospectively collected as part of an oral-As2O3 treatment protocol of patients. The samples were separated into plasma (P), white blood cell (WBC) and red blood cell (RBC) fractions. Elemental arsenic was measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, ELAN DRCplus 6100, PerkinElmer-SCIEX, Canada) after dilution with 2% nitric acid +/– 3% methanol. Bone marrow trephine biopsies were dried at 65°C overnight, completely digested with acid, and diluted to appropriate concentrations. Results. There were 15 male and 11 female APL patients. Seven WBC specimens could not be analyzed due to inadequate material. Specimens were collected at 1 month (Group 1), 2–12 months (Group 2) and 24–41 months (Group 3) after cessation of oral-As2O3 treatment. The median cumulative dose of oral-As2O3 was 1980 (560–3680) mg. As control, samples were obtained from 12 anonymous individuals, whose specimens were collected as part of their diagnostic evaluations. These controls had no known medicinal exposure to arsenic. The mean elemental arsenic levels in the specimens were shown below. Elemental arsenic levels in group 1 were significantly higher than groups 2 and 3 in all specimens tested. However, groups 2 and 3 were comparable to controls, indicating that arsenic was rapidly excreted once oral-As2O3 treatment was stopped. In group 1 patients, all specimens tested showed comparable arsenic levels. In group 2 patients, arsenic levels were significantly higher in BM–WBC (but not PB-WBC) as compared with PB-P and BM-P (p=0.043 for both). In group 3 patients, all cellular specimens tested showed comparable arsenic levels to plasma levels. Conclusion. Immediately after cessation of treatment when plasma arsenic level was still high, elemental arsenic was distributed comparably in different compartments. However, when plasma arsenic levels started to decline, preferential concentration of arsenic occurred in the cellular compartments. This could be related to transfer of arsenic in bones to the developing hematopoietic cells in the marrow milieu. Finally, two or more years after cessation of As2O3 therapy, elemental arsenic levels returned to control levels; a reassuring observation that long-term arsenic accumulation did not take place when oral-As2O3 was used therapeutically during a finite period of time. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Oral arsenic trioxide is a novel preparation or arsenic trioxide currently under consideration for registration in Hong Kong for APL treatment. The University of Hong Kong holds the patent for the product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207