PREDICTING THE FAILURE LOAD OF THE DISTAL TIBIA BY PERIPHERAL QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: WHAT PROPERTIES AND WHERE SHOULD WE MEASURE?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study identified imaging parameter(s) which best predict the mechanical properties of distal tibia. Seventeen human cadaver tibiae were assessed by PQCT at four, eight and ten percent site from distal and tested in compression at the twenty-five percent distal portion. Ultimate compressive loads were recorded with a mean of 8276 ± 2915 N. Spearson rank correlation and stepwise regression analysis revealed that CoA, total BMC, SSI and SSI4-TrA4-CoD4 combination had statistically significant correlations with the failure loads. Among all imaging parameters, SSI had the highest relevance due to its account for geometry, density and material distribution, important factors for structural properties. Musculoskeletal diseases, especially hip fractures, have huge and growing impact on Canadian society. To develop techniques for identification of high risk population, we needed a link between clinical evaluations and laboratory measures of bone health. This study identified imaging parameter(s) which best predict the mechanical properties of distal tibia. Seventeen human cadaver tibiae were considered in this study (mean age seventy-four, SD six years). PQCT was used to assess the four, eight and ten percent site. It measured the cross-sectional area, bone mineral content and bone mineral density of the cortical bone, trabecular bone and combined. Strength Strain Index (SSI) was calculated from these measurements. Each tibia was cut at twenty-five percent distal. Compressive force was applied uniaxially through a custom-made PMMA indentor onto the distal plateau along the longitudinal axis of the tibia at a rate of 10mm/s. Load and displacement data were recorded. Spearson rank correlation and stepwise regression analysis were used to identify individual and combination of imaging variables that were related to ultimate failure load. Ultimate failure loads were recorded with a mean of 8276 ± 2915 N. Cortical area (R_0.72), total BMC (R_0.72) and SSI (R_0.86) had statistically significant correlations with the failure load. Stepwise regression revealed that the combination of SSI, TrA, CoD at 4% site explained the greatest amount of variance (R2 = 0.868) and SSI was the major contributor. SSI takes the polar moment of inertia (geometry), density and distribution of material into account. This explains its relevance towards predicting the ultimate failure load. Please contact author for referenced images
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".