MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A randomized phase II study of OGX-427 plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2012· article· en· W2583230376 on OpenAlexaff
Kim N., Sebastién J. Hotte, Susan Ellard, Joel Roger Gingerich, Anthony M. Joshua, Christian Kollmannsberger, Evan Y. Yu, Martin Gleave

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreJuravinski Cancer CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerTolerabilityInternal medicineClinical endpointUrologyChemotherapyOncologyCancerGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

121 Background: Heat Shock Protein 27 (Hsp27) is a stress-activated, multi-functional chaperone protein highly expressed in cancer that regulates cell signaling and survival pathways implicated in cancer progression. In prostate cancer models, Hsp27 complexes with androgen receptor (AR) and enhances transactivation of AR-regulated genes. OGX-427 is a 2nd generation antisense that inhibits Hsp27 expression with in vitro and in vivo efficacy. Phase I studies have demonstrated tolerability and single agent activity. Methods: Patients (pts) with CRPC, no/minimal symptoms and any prior treatment other than chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive prednisone (P) 5 mg PO BID or P with OGX-427 600 mg IV x 3 loading doses followed by 1000 mg IV weekly. Primary endpoint was the proportion of pts progression free (PSAWG 2 criteria) at 12 weeks. A 2-stage MinMax design (H0 = 5%, HA >20%, α=0.1, β=0.1) will enrol 32 pts total per arm and provide 70% power to detect the difference at a 0.10 1-sided significance. Secondary endpoints include PSA decline, measurable disease response, and circulating tumour cell (CTC) enumeration. Results: In the first 22 pts randomized (11 to OGX-427+P, 11 to P), baseline median age was 71 years (53-86), ECOG PS 0 or 1 in 64% and 36% of pts, median PSA 89 (6-606), metastases in bone/lymph nodes/liver or lung in 77%/64%/10%, 23% had prior treatment with P, and 91% had ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml (median 18/7.5 ml). Thus far, 82% of pts randomized to OGX-427+P have had a PSA decline (55% with ≥30% decline) and 18% a PSA increase; 40% of pts treated with P have had a PSA decline (20% with ≥30% decline), 10% no change and 50% with PSA increase. CTC conversion from ≥5 to <5/7.5 ml has occurred in 60% of pts randomized to OGX-427+P and 20% of pts treated with P alone. Grade 1-2 infusion reactions (e.g., chills, diarrhea, flushing) have occurred in 45% of pts receiving OGX-427+P and 1 pt developed hemolytic uremic syndrome after week 7 probably related to OGX. Conclusions: Preliminary data provide clinical support for the role of Hsp27 in AR signalling and as a therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Enrolment on this study continues. Funded by a grant from the Terry Fox Research Institute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207