Use of Low Dose Oral Vitamin K in the Treatment of Patients with INR Values of More Than 10.0.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The optimal therapy for patients who present with markedly prolonged INR values during warfarin therapy is undefined. Evidence suggests that the risk of bleeding increases directly with the degree of prolongation of the INR. Traditional therapy for patients with excessive warfarin associated anticoagulation has included warfarin withdrawal with or without vitamin K, transfusion therapy and admission to the hospital. As part of an ongoing international study, we prospectively enrolled 32 consecutive warfarin-treated patients presenting with an INR of more than 10.0. Eligible patients had no evidence of active bleeding or need for immediate correction of their INR. All patients received 2.5 mg of oral vitamin K, were not treated with coagulation factor replacement, and were followed over 90 days for clinical events and their INR response. Seventeen of the 32 patients were women, with an average age of 65.8 (range 31 to 89). Treatment of venous thrombosis and atrial fibrillation (12 patients each) were the most common indications for warfarin. Twenty-five patients had a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0; the remainder had a target of 2.5 to 3.5. The mean INR at presentation was 12.9 (range 10.0 to 21.2). Of the 25 patients with a recorded INR value on the day following vitamin K, 19 (76%) had an INR of 6.0 or less (range 1.6 to 17.5, mean 5.0, 2 less than 2.0). On day 7 after study drug, the mean INR was 3.5 (range 1.6 to 17.5). Six (19%) patients reported bleeding over the 90 days after study drug: 1 (3%) bleed was major (retroperitoneal hemorrhage diagnosed the day after study drug) and 3 patients reported epistaxis or bruising within three days of study drug. Two patients reported late bleeding; one had a fall on day 8 at which time the INR was 10.5, and the other had bleeding associated with a surgical procedure 25 days after study drug. No patients had suspected or confirmed thrombosis, and no patients died during follow-up. This the first prospective study of vitamin K monotherapy for patients with INR values above 10, and confirms prior retrospective analyses which suggest that low dose oral vitamin K effectively lowers the INR in such patients. Our preliminary results also suggest that coagulation factor replacement may be unneeded in such patients. The true risk of bleeding, and the impact of degree of prolongation of the INR on the vitamin K response, will require additional patient recruitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".