MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583261682 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2017.1

Estimation of Source-To-Sink Mass Balance By A Fulcrum Approach Using Channel Paleohydrologic Parameters of the Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation, Canada

2017· article· en· W2583261682 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Wen Lin, Janok P. Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousSink (geography)Channel (broadcasting)Balance (ability)PaleontologyCartographyComputer scienceGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Trunk rivers transport the bulk of the sediment in a source-to-sink (S2S) system, and total mass passing through any cross section (i.e., fulcrum) of a trunk-river over geologic time should allow matching of source-area sediment delivery budgets to downstream sediment volumes deposited in the basin. We analyze the paleohydrology of ancient trunk channels and link downstream deltaic strata of Allomember E of the Cretaceous Dunvegan Alloformation in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin to test the total mass-balance fulcrum approach. Bankfull channel depth and width, grain size, paleoslope, velocity, and discharge are derived from outcrop, core, and well logs. Some parameter estimates use multiple methods, providing a range of values and serve as a cross check of independent methods. Estimates of annual flood frequency and paleodischarge, associated with long-term geologic-time estimates, are derived from chronostratigraphic analysis and allow calculation of cumulative sediment discharge. Isopach maps are used to measure sink-area sediment volumes. The results indicate that the trunk river of Allomember E was 10–15 m deep and 150–250 m wide, carried fine- to medium-grained (< 200 microns) sand, and flowed over a low-gradient paleoslope of 4.1–6.1 × 10–5. Annual total sediment discharge is estimated to have ranged from 5.4 to 12 × 106 m3. Within 25,000 years, the river is estimated to have transported 135–307 km3 of sediment into the basin. This is consistent with the 130 km3 of sediment mapped in the study area. However, the upper-range estimate of sediment delivered into the sink is 2.5 times the measured sediment volume in the map area, which, if accurate, suggests significant sediment escape. This supports the hypothesis that in Dunvegan time, mud was widely dispersed southward, along the Alberta Foreland Basin by geostrophic currents associated with storm processes and counterclockwise oceanic gyres in the Cretaceous Seaway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207