MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583615333 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.205121

Ising antiferromagnet in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with mismatched Fermi surfaces

2017· article· en· W2583615333 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Gukelberger, Lei Wang, Lode Pollet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEuropean Research CouncilMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsIsing modelPhysicsQuantum Monte CarloHubbard modelAntiferromagnetismMonte Carlo methodGround stateCondensed matter physicsMonte Carlo method in statistical physicsPhase diagramSpin (aerodynamics)Statistical physicsQuantum mechanicsHybrid Monte CarloPhase (matter)MathematicsMarkov chain Monte Carlo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the phase diagram of the two-dimensional repulsive Hubbard model with spin-dependent anisotropic hopping at half filling. The system develops Ising antiferromagnetic long-range order already at infinitesimal repulsive interaction strength in the ground state. Outside the perturbative regime, unbiased predictions for the critical temperatures of the Ising antiferromagnet are made for representative interaction values by a variety of state-of-the-art quantum Monte Carlo methods, including the diagrammatic Monte Carlo, continuous-time determinantal Monte Carlo, and path-integral Monte Carlo methods. Our findings are relevant to ultracold atom experiments in the $p$ orbital or with spin-dependent optical lattices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207