MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Imatinib in Children with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CP CML): AAML0123 COG Study.

2006· article· en· W2583651793 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Champagne, Cecilia Fu, Myron Chang, Linda D. Cooley, Nyla A. Heerema, Charlotte Wood, Mary French, Franklin O. Smith, Mark L. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImatinibImatinib mesylateChronic myelogenous leukemiaInternal medicineGastroenterologyAbsolute neutrophil countPhases of clinical researchLeukemiaChemotherapySurgeryNeutropeniaMyeloid leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction. Our prior phase 1 study (P9973) established the safety profile and suggested efficacy of imatinib in children with CP CML at doses varying from 260–570 mg/m2. The purpose of this phase 2 study was to define the rates of response in children with previously untreated CP CML. Methods. Patients less than 22 years of age at study entry with newly diagnosed CP CML, with no prior therapy other than hydroxyurea, were eligible. Imatinib was administered orally at a dose of 340 mg/m2 daily, with courses defined as 28-day intervals. A hematological response (HR) was defined at the end of courses 1 and 2 as a reduction in the white-cell count to <10 x 109/L and in platelet count to <450 x 109/L, and was considered a complete response (CHR) when maintained for at least four weeks. Cytogenetic response is defined as follows, based on the absolute percent of Ph+ metaphase cells on marrow specimens: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) 0% Ph+ cells; partial (PCyR)1–35%; minor 39–65%; minimal 66–95%; none 96–100%. Iterative cytogenetic analyses were performed every 3 months during therapy. Toxicities were reported prospectively using the NIH CTCv2.0 criteria. Results. 50 children (42% boys), with a median age of 11.8 years (range 2.3–19.1) completed more than one course of therapy and were evaluable for response. Median number of courses delivered was 22.5 (range 1–43), with a median follow-up of 795 days. 96% of the calculated dose was administered. Eleven patients experienced 14 non-hematological grade 2–4 adverse events, and one patient discontinued therapy because of toxicity. The HR and CHR rates were 78% and 12%, at the end of course 1, and 20% and 78%, respectively, at the end of course 2. Only one patient was reported as a hematologic non-responder at the end of course 2. At the end of the third course, 33 patients were evaluated for cytogenetic response. Twelve (36%) children were in CCyR; 10 (30%) in PCyR; 5 in minor response; 4 in minimal response; 2 with no cytogenetic response. Six patients did not have cytogenetic evaluation; while in 11 (33%) the study was not possible due to insufficient sampling. Overall, 33 (66%) CCyRs were documented, at a median time of 5.6 months (91% documented by 9 months). Only 1 patient achieved a CCyR after course 10. Thirty-three children were removed from protocol, of which 23 underwent stem cell transplantation. One patient progressed to blast phase while on therapy, while six additional patients had cytogenetic progression. Of the 3 remaining patients, two patients had difficulty with taking medications and one had grade 4 liver toxicity. At 1 year, the estimated event free and overall survivals are 96% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion. Imatinib is well tolerated in previously untreated children with CP CML and induces comparable rates of complete cytogenetic response to those observed in adults. Current evaluation of molecular response is being performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207