MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ex Vivo Gene Trasfer for Hemophilia A That Enhances Safety and Results in Sustained In Vivo Factor VIII Expression from Lentivirally-Engineered Endothelial Progenitors.

2006· article· en· W2583856608 on OpenAlexaff
Hideto Matsui, Masaru Shibata, Brian D. Brown, Andrea Labelle, Carol Hegadorn, C. Webb Andrews, Robert P. Hebbel, Jacques Galipeau, Christine Hough, David Lillicrap

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrigelGenetic enhancementEx vivoIn vivoProgenitor cellViral vectorTransgeneMolecular biologyMedicineImmunologyBiologyStem cellGeneRecombinant DNACell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hemophilia is an excellent candidate disorder for the use of gene therapy as a treatment modality. However, significant obstacles have been encountered with systemic delivery of viral vectors that have prevented sustained expression of the therapeutic protein. Investigation of alternative gene therapy strategies for hemophilia that enhance safety and facilitate long-term, therapeutic levels of the transgene product is imperative. In this study, we evaluated an ex vivo gene therapy strategy for hemophilia A. Circulating endothelial cell progenitors (blood outgrowth endothelial cells - BOECs) were isolated from canine and mouse blood and transduced with a third generation self-inactivating lentiviral vector encoding the canine FVIII transgene under the transcriptional control of either the CMV promoter or an endothelial cell-specific regulatory element. Transduced BOECs were injected either intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously mixed with Matrigel (SC+Matrigel) into NOD/SCID mice. Canine FVIII antigen levels were assayed at weekly intervals using an Asserachrom VIII:Ag ELISA that detects canine FVIII against a background of normal murine FVIII levels in the NOD/SCID mice. The mean FVIII antigen levels in mice injected with BOECs at 3 weeks following treatment were 37.5 mU/mL and 105.8mU/mL, for IV and SC+Matrigel administration, respectively. These FVIII antigen levels were sustained up to 12 weeks at therapeutic levels (21.3mU/mL and 21.7mU/mL, for IV and SC+Matrigel administration respectively). To evaluate if the observed loss of FVIII expression by 12 weeks post-treatment resulted from transcriptional silencing of the viral promoter, the CMV promoter was replaced with the endothelial cell-specific thrombomodulin (TM) promoter and transduced BOECs were implanted SC with Matrigel. In contrast to results from the CMV-regulated transgene, sustained therapeutic levels of FVIII have been documented for the duration of the study with the TM-regulated construct (34.3 mU/mL at 3 weeks and 22.5 mU/mL at 20 weeks) Immunostaining at 18 weeks after SC implantation of the transduced BOECs, shows that these cells still express FVIII and von Willebrand Factor. Biodistribution analysis by flow cytometry and quantitative PCR demonstrated that SC-implanted BOECs were retained inside the scaffold and were not detected at any other anatomic site. These results indicate that genetically-modified endothelial progenitors implanted in a SC scaffold can provide sustained therapeutic levels of FVIII and are a promising safe delivery vehicle for gene therapy of hemophilia. Currently, these engineered cells have been implanted into immunocompetant mice and FVIII levels are being assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→