Asthma as a Psychosomatic Disorder: The Causes, Scale of the Problem, and the Association with Alexithymia and Disease Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: While psychological factors may play a significant role in the development and course of asthma, the availability of information on the scale of the problem and the factors associated with psychogenic asthma is limited. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of coexistence of asthma and other diseases considered to be of psychosomatic origin, to assess the impact of stress and strong emotions on the occurrence of acute exacerbations of asthma, to measure the level of alexithymia in asthmatic patients, and to look for its association with acute exacerbations triggered by stress and strong emotions. The level of alexithymia was also assessed in the context of asthma control. Materials and methods: The study was conducted on a group of 54 patients (75.9% females) with a diagnosis of asthma (mean age: 54.37 ± 14.52 years) at the Independent Public Central Teaching Hospital in Warsaw, Poland. The patients completed a questionnaire composed of the Asthma Control Test, a list of factors that could trigger an acute exacerbation of asthma, and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-26; translated into Polish by E. Scigala and T. Maruszewski). The patients were also asked about any co-morbidities that had been diagnosed by other doctors and that might be caused, at least in part, by psychological and behavioural factors, and co-morbidities that might be associated with stress but are characterised by somatic manifestations. The co-morbidities in question were: irritable bowel syndrome, atopic dermatitis, depression, panic disorder, and anorexia nervosa. In the remainder of this paper these disorders are collectively referred to as ‘psychosomatic disorders’. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 14.0 PL at the significance level p < 0.05. Non-parametric tests for independent samples were used to test the associations between the qualitative variables. Results: In 50% of the cases, at least one of the following disease entities were identified in the patients carrying the diagnosis of asthma: irritable bowel syndrome (n = 8), atopic dermatitis (n = 7), depression (n = 13), panic disorder (n = 9). Alexithymia was diagnosed in 11 cases (21.6%). The correlation of the level of alexithymia with stress and strong emotions was statistically non-significant (χ2 = 0.106, p > 0.05). Stress and/or strong emotions were identified as factors triggering acute exacerbations of asthma in 33 cases (61.1%). Poor, good, and complete asthma control was confirmed in 72.5%, 17.6% and 9.8% of the cases, respectively. No association of asthma control with the occurrence of alexithymia was identified (χ2 = 0.358, p > 0.05). No association of asthma control with gender was identified (χ2 = 0.605, p > 0.05). Conclusions: The high level of alexithymia in asthmatic patients, the frequent occurrence of disorders considered to be psychosomatic in origin, and the considerable impact of stress and strong emotions on the development of acute exacerbations of the disease confirm that asthma can be considered a psychosomatic disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".