MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583953778 · doi:10.1177/0892705716679480

Foaming behavior of microcellular poly(lactic acid)/TPU composites in supercritical CO <sub>2</sub>

2017· article· en· W2583953778 on OpenAlexafffund
Daifang Xu, Kejing Yu, Kun Qian, Chul B. Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermoplastic polyurethaneNucleationCrystallinitySupercritical fluidDifferential scanning calorimetryComposite materialCrystallizationScanning electron microscopeUltimate tensile strengthSupercritical carbon dioxideCrystalliteGlass transitionPolymerChemical engineeringElastomerOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the effects of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) on the crystallization and melt strength of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and on the enhancement of cell nucleation and expansion ratio to manufacture microcellular thermoplastic PLA foams in supercritical carbon dioxide. Addition of TPU increased the crystallinity and decreased the crystallite size as observed by differential scanning calorimetry and polarized optical microscope. The formed crystal domains worked as cross-linking points to increase the melt strength of a polymer that potentially affected the cell growth. Scanning electron microscope confirmed the immiscibility between PLA and TPU, and TPU was dispersed as islands in the PLA matrix. This phase morphology further influenced the cell structure of the PLA/TPU foams. TPU acted as a nucleating agent to enhance heterogeneous cell nucleation that is caused by the decrease in free energy barrier. Tensile stress that generated around the TPU and in some local regions surrounding the crystals and crystallization was dominant to induce cell nucleation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermoplastic Composite MaterialsSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207