MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Vitro Erythroid Cell Expansion Analysis in Polycythemia Vera.

2006· article· en· W2584019337 on OpenAlexaff
Donghoon Yoon, Hana Bruchova, Archana M. Agarwal, Josef T. Prchal, Jaroslav F. Prchal

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycythemia veraErythropoiesisBiologyTransferrin receptorImmunologyErythropoietinPopulationPeripheral blood mononuclear cellReticulocyteStem cellCell biologyAndrologyTransferrinMedicineInternal medicineIn vitroEndocrinologyGeneticsAnemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polycythemia vera (PV) is an acquired myeloproliferative clonal stem cell disorder characterized by cytokine hypersensitivity. The erythroid colony forming assay has been useful in PV diagnosis. However, studies aiming to elucidate molecular mechanism in PV pathogenesis often require large numbers of cells from a specific erythroid stage. For this purpose, we had adapted the mouse expansion assay described by Karur et al (Blood, 2006 in E-Pub) and differential display method described by Zhang et al (Blood, 2003, 102; 3938) to develop a human erythroid expansion protocol. In this study, we used peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) from PV patients and healthy donors, and expanded them along erythroid lineage in 21 day culture. Through the culture, we took samples at 8 timepoints (days 1, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16, 19, 21) to evaluate differentiation patterns. We had generated 5 different regions using CD71 (transferrin receptor) and CD235a (glycophorin A) and characterized these regions by standard morphology analysis. This protocol allowed differentiation of PB-MNCs to all erythroid stages ending with late normoblast, reticulocyte, and mature erythrocytes (which do not survive well in this culture environment). The erythroid differentiation and proliferation patterns were different between PV and normal. In the first week of culture, there was no significant proliferation difference observed between PV and normal. In contrast, the differentiation progressed more rapidly in PV, likely reflecting the differentiation of Epo independent PV population (since the first week culture contains no Epo). In the second week of culture (Epo present), there was a markedly increased expansion of PV erythroid cells. However, the differentiation pattern of PV resembled that of normal. In conclusion, we demonstrated that our in vitro expansion method allows expansion of PB-MNCs along erythroid lineage with 60~80% stage homogeneity as to the stage of differentiation in both PV and normal. The differences of differentiation and proliferation pattern between PV and normal reflected the expected biological behavior of erythroid progenitors. Thus, the expansion protocol is useful to study molecular mechanism of PV pathogenesis, which requires large number of erythroid progenitors of various stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207