MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584026579 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2016-0300

Biological nitrogen fixation and plant growth promotion of lodgepole pine by an endophytic diazotroph <i>Paenibacillus polymyxa</i> and its GFP-tagged derivative

2017· article· en· W2584026579 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Qian Tang, Akshit Puri, Kiran Preet Padda, Chris P. Chanway

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPaenibacillus polymyxaBiologySeedlingDiazotrophNitrogen fixationInoculationBotanyEndophyteColonizationHorticultureBacteriaMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paenibacillus polymyxa P2b-2R is an endophytic diazotroph originally isolated from lodgepole pine. It is reported to fix significant amounts of nitrogen (N) and promote plant growth. To evaluate the endophytic colonization sites, a green fluorescent protein (GFP) derivative of P2b-2R was generated (P2b–2Rgfp), but the effects of GFP modification on the functioning of P2b-2R have not been fully elucidated yet. In this study, we wanted to confirm and contrast the N-fixing and plant-growth-promoting abilities of P2b-2Rgfp with those of the wild-type P2b-2R in lodgepole pine. Pine seedlings were grown in an N-limited environment and harvested 2, 4, 8, and 12 months after inoculation to evaluate the endophytic and rhizospheric colonization by both strains, the amount of N-fixed, and seedling growth enhancement. Both P2b-2R and P2b-2Rgfp strains formed persistent rhizospheric and endophytic populations; fixed N; and enhanced seedling growth continuously after 4 months. P2b-2Rgfp-treated seedlings outperformed the P2b-2R-treated seedlings in terms of biomass only during the initial stages of plant development, but the differences decreased during the trial and were not significant towards the end. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that reports the effects of GFP-tagging of an endophyte when inoculated into a gymnosperm tree species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207