Park roads: a comparative study for definitions for a Brazilian touristic experience.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The configuration of park roads in the Brazilian experience is very recent. Yet, it is a precursor for a worldwide fact, especially regarding the progress of legislation that can support this demonstration space to promote the protection of an ecological corridor with touristic uses, it is the thought of park road category in the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC). However, compared to the foreign experience, mainly Canadian and American, we find a mismatch in the gains that the realization of a park road can lead to environmental planning and tourism in Brazil. The interpretive method of this research is based on Semiotics by Charles Sanders Peirce, highlighting the role of representation as the election of two signs bearing the ideologies of the issuer. Different modes of park road representation may reveal a "matrix" of common content, denoted in foreign or national experience, and between the two; so, characteristics that identify them could be interpreted. For this, the methodology is to study the cases of park road in Brazil and abroad, in order to define specific parameters from one case to another, as well as common elements between the two cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".