MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

True Public Access Defibrillator Coverage is Overestimated

2015· article· en· W2584174002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher Sun, Derya Demirtas, Steven C. Brooks, Laurie J. Morrison, Timothy C. Y. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Twente Research Information · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEveningMedical emergencyAutomated external defibrillatorEmergency medicineEmergency medical servicesPublic accessCardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitationLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occur at all times of the day and night. Immediate access to an AED increases survival. However, most public-location AEDs are placed in buildings without 24 hour access. Objective: To measure fixed-location public AED coverage of OHCAs by time of day and day of week in a Canadian urban setting. Methods: We identified all atraumatic public OHCAs occurring in Toronto, Canada from Jan. 2006 – Aug. 2014. We obtained a list of registered AEDs from Toronto Emergency Medical Services as of March 2015 and determined the hours that each AED was available based on operating hours of the building housing the AED. We counted the number of OHCAs that occurred within 100 m of an AED (“assumed 24/7 coverage”) and the number that occurred both within 100 m of an AED and when the AED was available (“actual coverage”). Statistical analysis was performed using a [chi]2 test. Results: We identified 2440 atraumatic public OHCAs and 737 registered AED locations. A total of 451 OHCAs were covered under assumed 24/7 coverage. In terms of actual coverage, 354 OHCAs were covered, representing a coverage loss of 25.5%. The figure shows coverage decreased by 8.6% during the day (8am-3:59pm), 28.6% in the evening (4pm-11:59pm), and 48.4% at night (12am-7:59am); the differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). During the evenings, nights, and weekends the coverage loss was 31.6%, which is when the majority (66.1%) of the OHCAs occurred. The largest coverage losses were found in schools (39.7%), industrial facilities (39.3%), recreation facilities (37.1%), and offices (35.7%). Transportation facilities, long term care homes and homeless shelters had no coverage loss. Conclusion: One out of every four OHCAs in proximity of an AED occurs when that AED is inaccessible due to lack of 24/7 access. When deciding on candidate locations for placement of AEDs, temporal access should be considered to maximize the number of lives saved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Twente Research InformationSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207