MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584731117 · doi:10.2134/agronj2016.10.0616

Fall Rye Reduced Residual Soil Nitrate and Dryland Spring Wheat Grain Yield

2017· article· en· W2584731117 on OpenAlexaff
Ben W. Thomas, Francis J. Larney, Martin H. Chantigny, Claudia Goyer, Xiying Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomySecaleRaphanusCover cropTillageCropFertilizerAmmonium nitrateEnvironmental scienceCrop yieldSoil waterNutrientBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Fall rye reduced pre‐plant nitrate by 2 to 18 times compared with tillage radish. Fall rye reduced dryland spring wheat grain yield by 38 to 58% compared with tillage radish. Pre‐plant soil NH 4 –N plus NO 3 –N explained 93% of spring wheat grain yield variability. Limited information about how cover crop management impacts the agronomic performance of succeeding annual crops in semiarid regions constrains cover crop utilization. Therefore, over 2 yr we quantified how cover crop species (fall rye [ Secale cereale L. ‘AC Remington’] or oilseed radish [ Raphanus sativus L. ‘Tillage radish’]) and nutrient source (compost or inorganic fertilizer) affected cover crop biomass and N uptake, soil nitrate N (NO 3 –N) and ammonium N (NH 4 –N), and the agronomic performance of the succeeding spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) test crop. Fall rye reduced pre‐plant NO 3 –N by 2 to 18 times compared with oilseed radish, and reduced spring wheat grain yields by 38 to 58% compared with amended soils with no cover crop and oilseed radish. Inorganically fertilized soils led to 21% greater pre‐plant soil NO 3 –N concentrations than the compost‐amended soil in 2013–2014 but nutrient source did not significantly affect NO 3 –N concentrations in 2014–2015. A quadratic function explained 93% of the variability between pre‐plant soil NH 4 –N plus NO 3 –N (0–7.5‐cm depth) and spring wheat grain yield in 2014, indicating that the N supply limited spring wheat grain yield. We conclude that fall rye scavenged residual NO 3 –N better than oilseed radish during the non‐growing season, particularly during the spring period when this perennial species assimilates N, but under semiarid conditions it may decompose and mineralize too slowly to supply N at the right time for the subsequent crop, while oilseed radish tended to boost spring wheat grain yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207