MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Consolidative high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) after conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) as first salvage treatment for male patients (pts) with metastatic germ cell tumors (mGCTs).

2012· article· en· W2584972501 on OpenAlexaff
Michel S. Beausoleil, Kylea Potvin, Kang Howson‐Jan, D. Scott Ernst, Larry Stitt, Eric Winquist

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarboplatinChemotherapyEtoposideSalvage therapyCisplatinGerm cell tumorsOncologyInternal medicineTesticular cancerSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

336 Background: Some men with mGCTs progressing after response to initial cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy are cured with CDCT as 1st salvage, however, many are not. Prognosis has recently been better defined by the IPFSG prognostic factors. HDCT with autologous stem cell rescue has been routinely offered after CR/PRm- remission with CDCT at our institution over the past two decades. We retrospectively reviewed our data to assess the validity of the IPFSG prognostic factors and evaluate the potential value of this approach. Methods: Eligible men with mGCTs progressing after at least 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy received after 01 Jan 1990 and treated with cisplatin-based CDCT+/−HDCT (etoposide + carboplatin) were identified and data collected. Pts were classified into risk groups using IPFSG factors, PFS and OS were analyzed and results for CDCT+/−HDCT compared. Results: 38 eligible 1st salvage pts had received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1–7) of CDCT. 20 pts received CDCT alone & 18 pts received CDCT+HDCT. Overall median PFS was 24.6 months (95%CI, 7.3–28.7) and overall median OS was 34.6 months (95%CI, 17.2–51.3). Distribution by IPFSG category, 2-year PFS and 3-year OS rates within each risk category were very similar to IPFSG results. Two toxic deaths occurred with CDCT. Pts treated with CDCT+HDCT more often had better responses to 1st-line chemotherapy and pure seminoma histology. Overall pts treated with CDCT+HDCT had improved PFS (HR: 0.18; 95%CI, 0.07–0.51; p=0.001) and OS (HR: 0.25; 95%CI, 0.10–0.65; p=0.004) compared to CDCT alone. Examination by IPFSG risk category showed that the 2-year PFS and 3-year OS rates for CDCT+HDCT was higher in all prognostic groups except for the very high risk which did not have any HDCT pts. Conclusions: The IPFSG prognostic factors were valid in our 1st salvage mGCT pts. The safety of HDCT with etoposide and carboplatin was confirmed. HDCT was associated with improved PFS and OS outcomes, consistent with observations of Lorch et al (JCO 2011). Ideally the value of optimal CDCT+HDCT should be determined in comparison to optimal CDCT as first salvage therapy in men with metastatic GCT in a randomized trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→