MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585252128 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.931

Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes of Serratia marcescens Infections in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis

2016· article· en· W2585252128 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chris Lata, Michael D. Parkins, Ranjani Somayaji, Harvey Rabin, Michael G. Surette, Ashley K. Dores, Sen Han Phang, Douglas G. Storey

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSerratia marcescensEpidemiologyCystic fibrosisPathogenic organismIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePediatricsMicrobiologyEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Cystic fibrosis (CF) airway infections are often viewed as being confined to a few classical pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia complex, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. However, a range of other organisms are commonly observed in CF; organisms where the epidemiology, natural history and clinical consequences are not understood. Herein we sought to characterize Serratia marcescens infections in adults with CF. Methods. We retrospectively audited the Calgary Adult CF program clinical records to identify patients with a history of sputum S. marcescens isolation. Baseline demographics were assessed. We compared those with sustained infection to patients with only transient isolation, as well as to age and time-matched patients with no history of S. marcescens infection to identify risk factors for infection and various outcomes such as lung function decline, mortality and lung transplantation. Results. Over the study period 9.4% of patients (29/318) had sputum positive on at least one occasion for S. marcescens. While 18 patients had transient infections clearing immediately, 11 patients had sustained infection (median 9.1 months, IQR 5–30 months). Pulmonary exacerbation was only observed in 48% of cases at incident isolation and did not differ significantly between incident transient and sustained infections. From the time of incident isolation, the number of pulmonary exacerbations was significantly increased in the following year in only those with transient infection. Compared to matched controls without S. marcescens, patients with sustained infection did not differ significantly in 5-year mortality (45% versus 23%, p = 0.64) or lung transplantation (18% versus 0%, p = 0.11). Conclusion. S. marcescens was identified as a relatively common organism from sputum culture in patients with CF. Approximately one third of patients experienced prolonged carriage of the organisms in their lower airways, but none persisted indefinitely with all eventually clearing infection. No evidence of short or long-term deleterious consequences were noted in our cohort. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207