THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCIAL AND MONETARY INSTRUMENTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN TAJIKISTANâÂÂS ECONOMY AND WAYS OF IMPROVING THEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study analyzes financial and monetary instruments and investigates ways of improving them, with a view to achieving a sustainable economic development of Tajikistan. It was proven that the period of economic transformation significantly changed the perception of the role of financial and monetary instruments in economic development and reinstated their priority in the system of state regulation of an emerging market economy. Nowadays, the state economic policy should take into account the development priorities of global markets and the rules and regulations of global competition. Further stabilization of the monetary sphere should bring with it a gradual reduction in reserve requirements, which will improve the conditions for attracting funds by banks and public institutions and enhance the competitiveness of commercial banks in general. Improvement of the mechanism of monetary and fiscal policy within the framework of the general state economic policy should contribute to the advancement towards macroeconomic balance, including internal and external balance of the economy, optimal combination of parameters of economic growth, employment, price of goods and services, and payments to the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".