MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585996731 · doi:10.3301/ijg.2015.28

Northern Provenance of the Gondwana Formation in the Lesser Himalayan Sequence: Constraints From 40Ar/39Ar Dating of Detrital Muscovite in Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya

2015· article· en· W2585996731 on OpenAlexafffund
Djordje Grujić, Isabelle Coutand, Michael Doon, Dawn A. Kellett

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Journal of Geosciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGondwanaGeologyProvenanceMuscovitePermianPaleontologySedimentary rockMetamorphic rockGeochemistrySequence (biology)TectonicsStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-grain 40Ar/39Ar dates are reported for detrital white mica from low-grade meta-arkose samples from the Gondwana Formation in the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya. The majority (61%) of single grains from five samples yielded dates of ~480 Ma. The remaining grains yielded dates between ~590 and 1700 Ma, and a few grains were younger than 480 Ma. These data suggest that the source of the Gondwana sedimentary rocks in the Himalaya lay to the north, in contrast to the previously held view that it was in the south. This also indicates that the Cambro-Ordovician granites, extensively present in the Himalayan metamorphic core, the Greater Himalayan Sequence, were exposed at the surface in the Permian in a mountain range to the north of the Permian continental rifts. Preservation of the original muscovite ages and the absence of evidence of a thermal overprint during the Himalayan orogenesis indicate that the burial temperatures of the Gondwanan sedimentary rocks, located at the base of the Lesser Himalayan Sequence, did not exceed 400 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian Journal of GeosciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207