MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586074121 · doi:10.5539/jmbr.v7n1p20

miRNA in Cancer Pathology

2017· article· en· W2586074121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mouneera Alakeel, Zainab Al-Doori

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Biology Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNABiologyGeneComputational biologyTranslation (biology)Gene expressionRegulation of gene expressionFunction (biology)BioinformaticsGeneticsMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNA/miRNA refers to types of RNA which are non-coding; they are21 to 25 nucleotides in length. In most cases, at particular nucleotide locations, they relate to one or more mRNAs. Deadenylation, cleavage, and alternative procedures of translation’s suppression are the means by which miRNA disturb gene repression. Recent investigations seem to propose that miRNAs are involved in many cell procedures and for this they became perfect targets for usage in healing purposes. Various miRNAs are involved in the development of human vascular diseases, due to their function in modulating vascular cell proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis via their targeted genes. Since vascular diseases are multifactorial and complex, numerous genes may be involved in their progression and regulation. Therefore, miRNAs can also have multiple gene targets, and in some instances, one gene can be modulated by various miRNAs. As of now, more than 800 human microRNAs have been identified using miBase, and work is still being conducted to search for and characterize new miRNAs. With rigorous clinical and fundamental studies, a clear understanding of how miRNAs function, in addition to the ways they can be used as biomarkers and targets for cancer and cardiovascular illnesses, will progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular Biology ResearchSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207