MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586091975 · doi:10.33524/cjar.v17i3.288

PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH AND PAYING IT FORWARD

2016· article· en· W2586091975 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Catherine Whalen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Action Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstitutionAction (physics)SociologyCitizen journalismAction researchPedagogyParticipatory action researchPersonal lifeManagementPublic relationsMedia studiesPolitical scienceSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I sit here and ponder about the wisdom and knowledge I want to pass on in my guest editorial piece and think back to almost 30 years ago. I was 23 and thought I had the world figured out and ready to make my mark in life. I was certainly naïve enough to think I was prepared to educate the world and anyone else who might want to listen. Fresh out of university, I took the first teaching job offered which was located in a small mining town in north western Ontario. It was about that time someone informed me that I would change my career at least three times in my life span. Since then, I have not only changed my career from secondary school teacher of 24 years, to operating my own consulting business for several years, and then taking on an Assistant Professor role in a School of Education program as my current position in life: I have moved schools and institutions several times. Although life has taken me from coast to coast and institution to institution, I have maintained one facet of my life that has not waivered - that is the opportunity to teach and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.271
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.271
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2710.271
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0150.078
Scholarly communication0.0300.032
Open science0.0060.022
Research integrity0.0170.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.925
GPT teacher head0.703
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Action ResearchSame topicEvaluation and Performance AssessmentFrench-language works237,207