MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586119351 · doi:10.1002/2016jd025767

Revisiting global fossil fuel and biofuel emissions of ethane

2017· article· en· W2586119351 on OpenAlexafffund
Zitely A. Tzompa‐Sosa, Emmanuel Mahieu, Bruno Franco, Christoph A. Keller, Alexander J. Turner, Detlev Helmig, Alan Fried, Dirk Richter, P. Weibring, J. Walega, Tara I. Yacovitch, Scott C. Herndon, D. R. Blake, Frank Hase, James W. Hannigan, Stéphanie Conway, Kimberly Strong, Matthias Schneider, Emily V. Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersClimate Program OfficeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEuropean CommissionUniversité de LiègeUniversity of TorontoFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSFP7 People: Marie-Curie ActionsCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesColorado State UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEmission inventoryNorthern HemisphereFossil fuelEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesBiofuelSouthern HemisphereAbundance (ecology)Greenhouse gasClimatologyMeteorologyGeographyChemistryAir quality indexGeologyEcologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent measurements over the Northern Hemisphere indicate that the long‐term decline in the atmospheric burden of ethane (C2H6) has ended and the abundance increased dramatically between 2010 and 2014. The rise in C2H6atmospheric abundances has been attributed to oil and natural gas extraction in North America. Existing global C2H6emission inventories are based on outdated activity maps that do not account for current oil and natural gas exploitation regions. We present an updated global C2H6emission inventory based on 2010 satellite‐derived CH4fluxes with adjusted C2H6emissions over the U.S. from the National Emission Inventory (NEI 2011). We contrast our global 2010 C2H6emission inventory with one developed for 2001. The C2H6difference between global anthropogenic emissions is subtle (7.9 versus 7.2 Tg yr−1), but the spatial distribution of the emissions is distinct. In the 2010 C2H6inventory, fossil fuel sources in the Northern Hemisphere represent half of global C2H6emissions and 95% of global fossil fuel emissions. Over the U.S., unadjusted NEI 2011 C2H6emissions produce mixing ratios that are 14–50% of those observed by aircraft observations (2008–2014). When the NEI 2011 C2H6emission totals are scaled by a factor of 1.4, the Goddard Earth Observing System Chem model largely reproduces a regional suite of observations, with the exception of the central U.S., where it continues to underpredict observed mixing ratios in the lower troposphere. We estimate monthly mean contributions of fossil fuel C2H6emissions to ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrate surface mixing ratios over North America of ~1% and ~8%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207