MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586132647 · doi:10.1002/chem.201604085

Synthesis of Unique Flowerlike Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)(NO<sub>3</sub>) Hierarchical Microstructures with High Surface Area and Superior Photocatalytic Performance

2017· article· en· W2586132647 on OpenAlexaff
Qiaofeng Han, Jiawei Pang, Xin Wang, Xiaodong Wu, Junwu Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyPhotocatalysisRhodamine BMaterials scienceDiffuse reflectance infrared fourier transformBismuthMicrostructureSpecific surface areaChemical engineeringAdsorptionNuclear chemistryChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Unique flowerlike Bi 2 O 2 (OH)(NO 3 ) (denoted as BION) hierarchical microstructures assembled by ultrathin nanosheets were hydrothermally synthesized from incomplete hydrolysis of anhydrous bismuth nitrate (Bi(NO 3 ) 3 ) after adsorption of glacial acetic acid (HAc). The structure, composition, and optical properties of the products were characterized by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), UV/Vis spectroscopy, etc. The as‐prepared flowerlike BION possessed an ultra‐high surface area and thus exhibited exceptional photocatalytic activity for rhodamine B (RhB) degradation under UV light irradiation with an efficiency of about 17; 6 and 2.5 times higher than spherical, aggregated sheet‐like BION and P25 TiO 2 , respectively, and also superior to the reported sheet‐like BION. It also showed good photocatalytic activity for crystal violet (CV) degradation. This work opens new routes for the rational design and synthesis of nontoxic basic bismuth nitrates with a facile synthetic approach, controllable morphology, and excellent photoreactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207