REPRODUCTION OF NATIVE POSTERIOR TIBIAL SLOPE IN CRUCIATE-RETAINING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: TECHNIQUE AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The posterior tibial slope angle (PTS) in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty influences the knee kinematics, knee stability, flexion gap, knee range of motion (ROM) and the tension of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The current technique of using an arbitrary (often 3–5 degrees) PTS in all cases seldom will restore native slope in cruciate retaining TKA. Questions/Purposes: The primary objective was to determine if we could surgically reproduce the native PTS in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. The second objective was to determine if reproduction of native slope was significant – ie influenced clinical outcome. We evaluated the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a series of consecutive total knee arthroplasties using the PFC sigma cruciate-retaining total knee system in 215 knees. The tibial bone cut was planned to be parallel to the patient9s native anatomical slope in the sagittal plane. An “Angel Wing” instrument was placed on the lateral tibial plateau and the slope of the cutting guide adjusted to make the cutting block parallel to the patient9s native tibial slope. All true lateral radiographs of the knee were measured for PTS using a picture achieving and communication system (PACS). PTSs were measured with reference to the proximal tibial medullary canal (PTS-M) and the proximal tibial anterior cortex (PTS-C). The knee ROM, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and SF-12 at the last follow-up were evaluated as clinical outcomes. The mean preoperative PTS-M was 6.9±3.3 degrees and the mean postoperative PTS-M was 7±2.4 degrees. The mean preoperative PTS-C was 12.2±4.2 degrees and the mean postoperative PTS-M was 12.6±3.4 degrees. There was no significant difference form the preoperative and postoperative PTS measurement in both techniques (p>0.05). We used an arbitrary 3 degrees as an acceptable range for PTS-M reproduction. The PTS-M was reproduced within 3 degrees in 144 knees (67%); designated as Group A. The 71 knees with a difference more than 3 degrees in (33%) were designated as Group B. Group A showed significantly larger gain in ROM compared with group B (p=0.04). Group A also had significantly better improvement in Knee society score and WOMAC score and SF-12 physical score when compare with group B (p Our modification of standard surgical technique reliably reproduced the native tibial slope in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. More importantly, reproduction of the patient9s native PTS within 3 degrees resulted in better clinical outcomes manifested by gain in ROM and knee functional outcome scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".