MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Relevance of α-Globin Genotyping in Patients Expressing HbH in Cord Blood: Prevalence of α-Globin Gene Deletions and α2-Globin Termination Codon Mutations in a Neonatal Hemoglobinopathy Screening Program

2008· article· en· W2586152906 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent‐Philippe Lavallée, Denis Soulières, Xiaoduan Weng, Louise Robin, Steven N. Girard, Gilbert Cornut, Marie-Lise Audette

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemoglobinopathyThalassemiaGeneticsBiologyAlpha-thalassemiaGenotypingGlobinMolecular biologyGenotypeGeneHemolytic anemiaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: α-Thalassemia results from an heterogeneous group of disorders involving the α-Globin genes. Common deletions are responsible for 95% of cases of α-thalassemia, whereas Constant Spring mutation (Hb CS), one of the known mutations involving the termination codon of α2-globin gene, is the most common non-deletional cause of α-thalassemia worldwide. Its prevalence has never been studied in occidental countries. Patients and methods: as part of our neonatal hemoglobinopathy screening program, fetal cord blood samples are systematically tested by HPLC. When an abnormal Hb or HbH is found, α-Globin deletion is carried by multiplex-PCR. A two part observational study was done at our center based on the available data from our hemoglobinopathy screening program available since 2002. Firstly, we aimed to determine the level of Hb H present and to correlate it to a specific type of α-Globin gene deletion by m-PCR sequencing (table 1). 306 samples were analyzed and demonstrated a statistically significant difference between categories of α-globin gene deletions: 2 del cis vs 1 del, 2 del trans vs 1 del, 2 del cis vs 2 del trans (difference of means of 8.07, 4.33 and 3.75 respectively, P<0.001). With HbH ≤3.15% a CI of 95% excludes a condition other that 1 α -globin gene deletion. With Hb H ≤7.1%, a CI of 99% excludes 2 α -globin gene deletions in cis. Table 1 Deletion/allelic distribution Hb H level (range) Hb H level (means) Std Dev 1 deletion 1.0 – 12.4 2.03 1.12 2 deletions cis - 10.1 2.16 2 deletions trans - 6.35 1.5 Our second goal was to establish the prevalence of α-Globin termination codon mutation in the fetal blood sampling containing ≥1% of Hb H in absence of α-Globin gene deletion by m-PCR. 395 fetal blood samples were analysed. Of these, 59 lacked α-Globin gene deletions. 17 were excluded from our analysis for lack of personal data or DNA. The 42 remaining samples were studied by amplification of the termination codon followed by an enzymatic digestion for the recognition site TTAA. 2 samples (5%) were found to be heterozygotes for α2-globin mutation, presumably CS mutation. The small number of positive cases does not permit the conduct of a powerful statistical analysis, however the two mutated samples had a high level of Hb H (2,9%) whereas only 21% of the 42 studied samples had an Hb H ≥2%. Conclusion: These results represent a step forward in diagnosis of α-thalassemia and in identification of patients requiring particular genetic counselling based on HbH level at birth in cord blood. These results also indicate that 5% of Hb H positive/α-Globin deletion negative samples were caused by termination codon mutation in an occidental urban based population, and that it could be of interest to search for these mutations, especially when the Hb H level is high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→