MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2586254847 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.394

P269 Phenotypic predictors of endoscopic recurrence after ileal resection for Crohn's disease: an NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium prospective study

2017· article· en· W2586254847 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karen Boland, Talin Haritunians, L. Philip Schumm, D. McGovern, Steven R. Brant, Jean‐Yves Rioux, Yashoda Sharma, Richard H. Duerr, J. Cho, Mark S. Silverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseProspective cohort studyEndoscopyPopulationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Disease recurrence in patients after ileal resection of Crohn's Disease (CD) is predictable and represents an excellent model to study the mechanisms of intestinal inflammation in an at-risk population. Our aim is to investigate genomic and microbial factors associated with post-operative endoscopic recurrence (ER). Here we present preliminary phenotypic analysis of recruited subjects to a prospective NIDDK Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium longitudinal study. Methods: Patients with CD scheduled to undergo ileocolic resection with primary anastomosis were recruited at 6 North American research centres using a standardised protocol. Clinical data and bio specimen collection for microbiome and histological assessment was performed pre-operatively and at follow up. A Rutgeert's score of at least i2 determined endoscopic recurrence. Bivariate analysis (χ2 test) was performed using Graphpad. Results: 294 patients were enrolled up to August 2016 and 122 had at least 1 post-operative endoscopy. The overall recurrence rate in the neo-terminal ileum up to 18 months was 33.6% (n=41/122). Early ER was present in 23.7% (n=29/122) at a median 6 months. CD recurrence was not significantly associated with Montreal classification, age, gender, smoking, or previous hospitalisations. Patients with a prior history of ileal resection had a higher risk of post-operative ER (p=0.004, RR 2.6 95% CI [1.5–3.8], n=9/41 vs n=3/81). Peri operative steroids (p=0.002, RR 3.4 95% CI [1.46–8.9]), combined immune suppressants and anti-TNF agents (p=0.028) and anti-TNF monotherapy use (p=0.056, RR 1.03 95% CI [1.002–4.04]) were associated reduced likelihood of ER. Use of anti-TNF therapy post-operatively was also associated with reduced recurrence (p=0.03, RR 2.81 95% CI [1.18–7.3], 15.7%, n=6/38 vs 41.6%, n=35/84). Patients recruited in the USA were more likely to receive anti-TNF therapy prior to first post-operative endoscopy (p=0.02, RR 2 95% CI l1.4–3.6]). Early recurrence rates were higher in Canadian centres although this was not statistically significant (p=0.45 [20% vs 40%]). Conclusions: Preliminary phenotypic results showed that previous surgery predicted endoscopic post-operative recurrence, potentially indicating a more aggressive phenotype. Steroid exposure perioperatively and use of anti-TNF biologic therapy peri- and post-operatively before colonoscopy were associated with lower risk of endoscopic recurrence, validating studies which show benefit of anti-TNF in prevention of post-operative recurrence. Future studies in this population will investigate microbial and transcriptomic profiles related to disease recurrence and ongoing recruitment will further expand our cohort

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→