MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586264038 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.609

PDCT-05. STEADY-STATE VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS TO BETTER ASSESS VISUAL FUNCTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH OPTIC PATHWAY GLIOMAS

2016· article· en· W2586264038 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Perreault, Sarah Zakaib Rassi, Dave Saint‐Amour, Luis H. Ospina, Yvan Samson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual fieldEvoked potentialVisual acuityMedicineVisual evoked potentialsContrast (vision)AudiologyMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroscienceOphthalmologyComputer sciencePsychologyRadiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optic Pathway Gliomas (OPG) represent 4-6% of brain tumors in children. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and visual acuity are usually used to evaluate clinical evolution and treatment response. Since the goal of treatment is to preserve vision, it is important to develop new rapid, reliable, and non-invasive techniques to objectively measure the integrity visual functions in patients with optic pathway gliomas. Using a new approach with steady state visual evoked potentials (ssVEP), we were able to simultaneously assess central and peripheral visual fields of participants. Two circular dartboard patterns from fovea to peripheral zones up to 32 degrees of eccentricity are presented to the patients at two different flickering frequencies 14.4 and 16 reversal/s. Each stimulation is presented at two different levels of contrast (96 and 30%) to maximise sensitivity. To assess visual field integrity, 8 blocks of 10 seconds are presented to the participants. Since the initiation of this pilot study, 14 controls and 4 patients with optic pathway gliomas have been enrolled and followed prospectively. The preliminary results indicate that the method is promising for evaluating the integrity of the visual field in visually impaired populations (i.e. children with OPGs). The next step of our project is to use this technique to measure visual functions in children with OPGs aged 4 to 21 years prospectively over a period of 12 months. We will compare ssVEP obtained with MRIs and standard assessments in neuro-ophthalmology, which includes visual acuity and optical coherence tomography. This new electrophysiology method could potentially improve the monitoring and management of patients with OPGs by reliably detecting subtle visual changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207