CONSIDERATIONS ON FORMATION, DESTRUCTION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF DISTRICT SIX (CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper clarifies the present conditions of District Six (Cape Town, South Africa), which was destructed by the Group Areas Act (No.41 of 1950) and discusses the validity of the planning idea and method of slum clearance and zoning based on the racial segregation. The major objective of this article is to review the idea and method of colonial town planning. ・District Six had been formed as a non-white quarter since the 1830's, which is well known as well as Bokaap which was formed as Malay quarter. Firstly, this paper deals with the history of development of District Six using the various maps and materials. Secondly, we consider the relationship between laws and space formation. Thirdly, this paper tries to reconstruct the District Six just before its demolishment and discusses the redevelopment plan based on the field survey checking all the buildings left at present. One of the conclusions is that slum clearance method is rooted in the modern planning method and is not special in apartheid system of South Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".