Study of the Relationship between Organizational Silence, Job Exhaustion and Job Performance among Farshousing Bank Staff
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between organizational silence, job exhaustion and job performance. It was a correlationstudy. The sample population included 642 employees of the Housing Bank of Fars province. Selection of the participants was carried out using a single-stage cluster sampling method and 133 subjects were selected as sample. In this study, three questionnaires including: job performance (Patterson, 1970), job exhaustion (Maslach & Jackson, 1981) and organizational silence (Vakvla & Bvradas, 2005) were used to collect data. Pearson correlation coefficient, stepwise regression analysis, mean, and standard deviation, were used to analyze the data. The result indicated that job performance and job exhaustion have a negative and significantcorrelation with institutional performance, among them, organizational silence, attitude of the headmaster towards the silence, and the prospect of higher management towards silence can reversely predict job performance and dimensions related to the communication opportunitieshave direct relationship with performance. Also, among the dimensions of job exhaustion, the dimension of reduction of personal success has a more effective role in job exhaustion of housing bank employees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".