MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586447120 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.590

P465 Efficacy of ustekinumab for induction and maintenance of histological healing in patients with Crohn's disease

2017· article· en· W2586447120 on OpenAlexaff
K. Li, Danny Chan, P Pollack, Jürgen M. Stein, Carrie Brodmerkel, Christopher Gasink, Brian G. Feagan, W. Sandborn, Paul Rutgeerts, Gert De Hertogh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyMaintenance therapyHistologyUstekinumabSurgeryDiseaseInfliximabChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) has been shown to induce & maintain clinical response & remission & to produce clinically meaningful endoscopic improvement in patients (pts) with moderate-severe Crohn's disease (CD). Effects of UST on histologic CD activity were evaluated in a substudy of the induction (UNITI-1&2) & maintenance (IM-UNITI) Phase 3 studies. Methods: At endoscopy, 2 biopsies were collected at induction baseline (I-Wk0), Wk8 (I-Wk8), & maintenance Wk44 (M-Wk44) from 3 anatomical regions (ileum, splenic flexure, rectum). One expert GI pathologist (GDH) blindly scored all biopsies using the Global Histology Activity Score (GHAS [1] for each region. At I-Wk0, pts received a single IV dose (UST 130 mg, UST ∼6 mg/kg, or PBO). At maintenance Wk0 (i.e. I-Wk8), UST induction responders (R, CDAI decrease ≥100 [CR]) were re-randomized to SC PBO, UST 90mg q12w or UST 90mg q8w; UST induction non-responders (NR) received SC UST 90mg → SC UST 90mg q8w if in CR after 8wks; PBO induction NR received UST IV 130mg → SC UST 90mg q12w if in CR after 8wks; and PBO induction R received PBO. Histology data from 251 substudy pts with simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) ≥3 (i.e. ulceration in any segment) at I-Wk0 were eligible for analysis. The relationship between GHAS & SES-CD was evaluated by Spearman correlation. Histologic improvements (i.e. change in GHAS from I-Wk0 at I-Wk8, M-Wk44) were assessed within each group (UST, PBO) & between groups (UST vs PBO, among pts with evaluable data at both I-Wk0 & I-Wk8, M-Wk44). Results: Regional & overall GHAS were moderately correlated with SES-CD at all timepoints (r=0.6, p<0.001). GHAS was significantly reduced at I-Wk8 in pts treated with UST (from 10.4 to 7.1, p<0.001) but not PBO (from 9.2 to 7.8). At M-Wk44 in the randomized maintenance population, a continued reduction in GHAS from I-Wk8 was observed with UST 90mg SC q8w (from 7.39 to 6.07, p=0.07) but not UST 90mg SC q12w (from 5.29 to 8.67) or PBO (from 9.19 to 10.85). In the pooled maintenance population (randomized & non-randomized), continued histologic improvement from I-Wk8 was observed with UST 90mg q8w (7.14 to 5.19, p<0.0001), but not UST 90mg q12w (from 6.14 to 7.18) or PBO (from 8.19 to 8.85). Consistent results are observed in between-group (UST vs. PBO) analyses, numerically greater GHAS reduction was observed for UST. Conclusions: Histologic & endoscopic disease activities were moderately correlated. Consistent with previously reported endoscopic results, statistically significant histologic improvements were observed in pts induced with UST, but not PBO. Trends for greater & continued histologic improvement were observed in pts who received UST 90mg q8w maintenance. References: [1] D'Haens GR, Geboes K, Peeters M, et al. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(2):262–267

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207