MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586517016 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00080

Variations in Hypoxia Impairs Muscle Oxygenation and Performance during Simulated Team-Sport Running

2017· article· en· W2586517016 on OpenAlexaff
Alice J. Sweeting, François Billaut, Matthew C. Varley, Ramón F. Rodriguez, Will G. Hopkins, Robert J. Aughey

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSprintConfidence intervalHeart rateHypoxia (environmental)Work rateMedicineOxygenationCardiologyInternal medicinePhysical therapyOxygenChemistryBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To quantify the effect of acute hypoxia on muscle oxygenation and power during simulated team-sport running. Method: Seven individuals performed repeated and single sprint efforts, embedded in a simulated team-sport running protocol, on a non-motorized treadmill in normoxia (sea-level) and acute normobaric hypoxia (simulated altitudes of 2000 m and 3000 m). Mean and peak power was quantified during all sprints and repeated sprints. Mean total work, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and quadriceps muscle deoxyhaemoglobin concentration (assessed via near-infrared spectroscopy) were measured over the entire protocol. A linear mixed model was used to estimate performance and physiological effects across each half of the protocol. Changes were expressed in standardized units for assessment of magnitude. Uncertainty in the changes was expressed as a 90% confidence interval and interpreted via non-clinical magnitude-based inference. Results: Mean total work was reduced at 2000 m (-10%, 90% confidence limits ±6%) and 3000 m (-15%, ±5%) compared with sea-level. Mean heart rate was reduced at 3000 m compared with 2000 m (-3, ±3 min-1) and sea-level (-3, ±3 min-1). Blood oxygen saturation was lower at 2000 m (-8, ±3 %) and 3000 m (-15, ±2 %) compared with sea-level. Sprint mean power across the entire protocol was reduced at 3000 m compared with 2000 m (-12%, ±3%) and sea-level (-14%, ±4%). In the second half of the protocol, sprint mean power was reduced at 3000 m compared to 2000 m (-6%, ±4%). Sprint mean peak power across the entire protocol was lowered at 2000 m (-10%, ±6%) and 3000 m (-16%, ±6%) compared with sea-level. During repeated sprints, mean peak power was lower at 2000 m (-8%, ±7%) and 3000 m (-8%, ±7%) compared with sea-level. In the second half of the protocol, repeated sprint mean power was reduced at 3000 m compared to 2000 m (-7%, ±5%) and sea-level (-9%, ±5%). Quadriceps muscle deoxyhaemoglobin concentration was lowered at 3000 m compared to 2000 m (-10, ±12 %) and sea-level (-11, ±12 %). Conclusions: Simulated team-sport running is impaired at 3000 m compared to 2000 m and sea-level, likely due to a higher muscle deoxygenation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207