MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586593251 · doi:10.29173/cais183

How Many Hurdles Do I Have to Jump? Conducting Research in an Elementary School Classroom

2013· article· fr· W2586593251 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Valerie Nesset

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEducational Assessment and Improvement
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines some of the issues that may arise when conducting research in an elementary school classroom. Using examples from a recent study on the information-seeking behaviour of grade-three students, the paper identifies and discusses potential problems and barriers to the research and suggests some ways to overcome them.Cet article examine quelques problèmes pouvant être rencontrés lors de la réalisation d’une recherche dans une classe de l’école élémentaire. Utilisant des exemples tirés d’une étude récente sur le comportement de recherche informationnelle des élèves de troisième année, cet article identifie et commente les problèmes potentiels et les barrières à la recherche. Cet article suggère quelques moyens pour surmonter ces obstacles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0160.031
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSISame topicEducational Assessment and ImprovementFrench-language works237,207