MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586717316 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.822

P698 The risk of developing subsequent immune mediated inflammatory diseases: a retrospective matched cohort study

2017· article· en· W2586717316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasisAnkylosing spondylitisCohortRheumatoid arthritisPsoriatic arthritisHidradenitis suppurativaInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineComorbidityDemographyPediatricsDiseaseImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with an existing immune mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) may be more likely to develop other IMIDs based on limited research. We sought to compare the risk of developing subsequent IMIDs among patients with and without an existing IMID. Methods: IMID risk was estimated in a large US insurance claims database (MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters, 1/2006–9/2015) for patients with each of 9 initial IMIDs (ankylosing spondylitis [AS], celiac disease [CE], hidradenitis suppurativa [HS], inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]; lupus [LU], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], psoriasis [PsO], rheumatoid arthritis [RA], uveitis [UV]). Up to 1,000 controls were matched with replacement by age, sex, state of residence and insurance type to case patients aged 18–64 who had an initial, incident IMID. Initial IMIDs were identified with ICD-9 diagnosis codes on ≥2 medical service claims ≥30 days apart. A case patient's earliest IMID claim was designated as the index date for the case and all matched controls. The 8 secondary IMIDs were identified by their first claim after the index date. All subjects had to have ≥365 days of continuous health plan enrollment before and after their index date. Risk of developing a secondary IMID (each of 8 and any of the 8) was analyzed by initial IMID with stratified Cox proportional hazards models and clustered standard errors to account for case-control match group. Results: Among 398,935 cases, mean age was 46 years and 63% were female. Mean number of matched controls per case was 644. Across the 9 initial IMID cohorts, range of median follow-up was 918–1,023 days for cases and 883–971 days for controls. Overall, any secondary IMID occurrence was significantly higher for cases (range: 5.2–47.2%) than for controls (range: 0.8–1.1%). Relative to matched controls, patients with an initial IMID had significantly higher risk of developing any of the other 8 secondary IMIDs (p≤0.002) (Table 1). Table 1 Patients with IBD as the primary condition had 7.5 times higher risk of developing a subsequent IMID compared with controls. Conclusions: The incidence risk for developing a subsequent IMID was significantly higher for patients newly diagnosed with an initial IMID than matched controls without the same initial IMID. Considering the risk of developing a subsequent immune-mediated comorbidity while establishing treatment goals may help maximize patients' long-term health-related quality-of-life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it