Four-Dimensional Microvascular Analysis Reveals That Regenerative Angiogenesis in Ischemic Muscle Produces a Flawed Microcirculation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Angiogenesis occurs after ischemic injury to skeletal muscle, and enhancing this response has been a therapeutic goal. However, to appropriately deliver oxygen, a precisely organized and exquisitely responsive microcirculation must form. Whether these network attributes exist in a regenerated microcirculation is unknown, and methodologies for answering this have been lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop 4-dimensional methodologies for elucidating microarchitecture and function of the reconstructed microcirculation in skeletal muscle. METHODS AND RESULTS: We established a model of complete microcirculatory regeneration after ischemia-induced obliteration in the mouse extensor digitorum longus muscle. Dynamic imaging of red blood cells revealed the regeneration of an extensive network of flowing neo-microvessels, which after 14 days structurally resembled that of uninjured muscle. However, the skeletal muscle remained hypoxic. Red blood cell transit analysis revealed slow and stalled flow in the regenerated capillaries and extensive arteriolar-venular shunting. Furthermore, spatial heterogeneity in capillary red cell transit was highly constrained, and red blood cell oxygen saturation was low and inappropriately variable. These abnormalities persisted to 120 days after injury. To determine whether the regenerated microcirculation could regulate flow, the muscle was subjected to local hypoxia using an oxygen-permeable membrane. Hypoxia promptly increased red cell velocity and flux in control capillaries, but in neocapillaries, the response was blunted. Three-dimensional confocal imaging revealed that neoarterioles were aberrantly covered by smooth muscle cells, with increased interprocess spacing and haphazard actin microfilament bundles. CONCLUSIONS: Despite robust neovascularization, the microcirculation formed by regenerative angiogenesis in skeletal muscle is profoundly flawed in both structure and function, with no evidence for normalizing over time. This network-level dysfunction must be recognized and overcome to advance regenerative approaches for ischemic disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".