A Comparative Study of the Anti-Breast Cancer and Immunomodulatory Effects of [6]-, [8]-, and [10]-Gingerol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[6]-Gingerol, [8]-gingerol, and [10]-gingerol are phytochemical extracts from ginger that are thought to contribute to its health-benefitting properties. The objectives of this investigation were to explore and compare the in vitro anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects of [6]-, [8]-, and [10]-gingerol on human and mouse mammary carcinoma cells, as well as their ability to inhibit T cell proliferation. [8]-Gingerol and [10]-gingerol induced mammary carcinoma cell death that did not require ROS production or caspase activation. All three gingerols inhibited the proliferation of mammary carcinoma cells and T cells, and the production of IFN-? by T cells. The production of IL-2 and the expression of early T cell activation markers, CD25 and CD69, were significantly decreased by [8]- and [10]-gingerol. The results demonstrated that [10]-gingerol was the most potent, followed by [8]-gingerol, then [6]-gingerol. Consequently, [8]- and [10]-gingerol warrant further investigation for the treatment of breast cancer and the control of inflammation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".