MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586951003 · doi:10.2118/184986-ms

2D Transient Simulation of Conjugate Natural Convection and Radiation within Thermal Wellbore Annuli

2017· article· en· W2586951003 on OpenAlexaff
Xueying Lu, Wanqiang Xiong, Zhangxin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsHeat transferAnnulus (botany)Thermal radiationFinite volume methodConvectionTransient (computer programming)Thermal conductionConvective heat transferThermodynamicsPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the petroleum industry, accurately estimating wellbore heat loss in thermal recovery processes remains a critical problem. One difficulty lies in simulating heat transfer and fluid dynamics within wellbore annuli. A literature survey shows that the state-of-the-art thermal wellbore simulators use empirical correlations to calculate the heat loss through wellbore annuli. As more sophisticated wells have been drilled, there is a growing need for a more detailed wellbore annulus heat transfer model. In this study, a 2D transient mathematical model is proposed for the conjugate natural convection and radiation within wellbore annuli. The governing equations consist of a continuity equation, a vorticity transfer equation, an energy transport equation and a radiative transfer equation (RTE). A finite volume approach with a second-order upwinding scheme is implemented for discretization. Newton-Raphson iterations are deployed for linearization. The algorithm is validated by consistence in simulation results compared with benchmark numerical solutions with the Rayleigh number up to 107. Parameters such as an aspect ratio, a radius ratio and a conduction-to-radiation coefficient are examined. A case study on vacuum insulated tubing heat transfer using Marlin Well A-6 data demonstrates the merits of the developed program by the consistence of simulation results compared with field measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical ConferenceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207