MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and health behaviors following cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CHEM): A multi-institutional study of testicular cancer survivors (TCS).

2016· article· en· W2587183463 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid, Chunkit Fung, AnnaLynn M. Williams, Howard D. Sesso, Sarah L. Kerns, Darren R. Feldman, Robert J. Hamilton, David J. Vaughn, Clair J. Beard, Hai Liu, Sophie D. Fosså, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Lois B. Travis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWaistInternal medicineOverweightOdds ratioLogistic regressionCancerPopulationNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyObesityEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

129 Background: TCS are at increased risk of CVD, but few clinical studies have comprehensively evaluated CVD risk factors through physical exams, lipid panels, and health behaviors in North American patients. Methods: Eligible TCS were < 50 y at diagnosis and treated with only first line CHEM. TCS underwent physical exams, had fasting lipid panels, and completed questionnaires regarding co-morbidities and health behaviors. Age, race, and educational status-matched controls (1:1) were chosen from the general population using the 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Odds ratios (OR) of outcomes among TCS versus matched controls were estimated using logistic regression models. Results: We evaluated 680 consecutively enrolled TCS. Median age at diagnosis was 31 y (range, 15-49) and at clinical evaluation 38 y (range, 19-68). Median time since CHEM was 4.3 y (range, 1-30). Compared to normative controls, TCS were more likely to be overweight (OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.26-2.16), have total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL (OR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.12-4.28) and LDL ≥ 160 mg/dL (OR = 3.05; 95% CI 1.03-9.00), and report alcohol use > 2 days/week (OR = 2.13; 95% CI 1.64-2.77). In contrast, they were more likely to have a waist circumference < 40 inches (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.04-1.66); engage in vigorous (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 2.11-3.29) or moderate (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.30-2.03) physical activity, and not smoke (OR = 2.95; 95% CI 2.14-4.08). TCS were about 3 times more likely overall to report excellent, very good, or good health compared to controls (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found comparing HDL, triglycerides, or self-reported hypertension (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Although North American TCS appear more likely to exercise and abstain from smoking compared to normative controls, a greater proportion are overweight and have higher fasting total cholesterol and LDL levels. Health care providers should screen TCS for CVD risk factors, and encourage practices consistent with a healthy lifestyle. Future research should elucidate mechanisms of increased CVD risk and ultimately develop customized prevention and intervention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→