Structural and Functional Relationships between Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzymes (E2s) and Ubiquitin Ligases (E3s)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first part of the thesis describes a systematic function analysis that identified in vitro E2 partners for ten different HECT E3 ligase proteins. Using mass spectrometry, the linkage composition for the resulting autoubiquitylation products of a number of functional E2-HECT pairs was determined. HECT domains from different subfamilies catalyze the formation of very different types of Ub chains, largely independent of the E2 in the reaction. The second part of the thesis describes the characterization of the RAD6-interactome. Using affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry, I identified a novel RAD6-interacting E3 ligase, KCMF1, which binds to a different surface on RAD6 than the other RAD6-associated E3 ligases. KCMF1 also recruits additional proteins to RAD6, and this new complex points to novel RAD6 functions. Interestingly, the RAD6A R11Q mutant polypeptide, found in X-linked mental retardation patients specifically loses the interaction with KCMF1, but not with other RAD6-associated E3 ligases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".