Inter-rater reliability of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) is an assessment of upper limb function designed for use in the stroke population. The CAHAI has strong reliability and validity in this population; however, it is unknown whether this measure can be used with other clinical populations such as acquired brain injury (ABI). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the inter-rater reliability of the CAHAI when used with persons with ABI. METHODS: The research design was an observational parameter estimation study. The administration of the CAHAI was videotaped for 6 persons with ABI. To estimate inter-rater reliability each video was assessed independently by 6 clinicians yielding a total of 36 assessments. A Latin square design was used to balance the order raters evaluated the videos. Shrout and Fleiss Type 2,1 intra class correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated to estimate inter-rater reliability of the CAHAI. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was high ICC = 0.96 (95% CL: 0.88, 0.99) and the SEM was 3.35 (95% CL: 2.63, 4.63) CAHAI points. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the CAHAI, although designed for use in the stroke population, can be used reliably in the ABI population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".